AI Assurance

Everyone will build you an AI agent. We'll tell you whether it works.

Evaluation suites, red-teaming, guardrails and production observability for enterprise AI systems — whether we built them or you did. Task-specific rubrics, deterministic graders and runnable environments. Not human spot-checks.

33%

Quality is the #1 blocker to putting agents in production

Cited ahead of latency and cost — survey of 1,340 practitioners, December 2025

29.5%

Of teams run no evaluations at all

Same survey. Nearly a third of teams are shipping on hope

>40%

Of agentic AI projects expected to be cancelled by end of 2027

Gartner forecast, published 2025 — unclear value and inadequate risk controls, not bad models

The systems that survive are the ones somebody can prove.

Four Offers

Timeboxed, scoped, and on the website.

Production Readiness Audit

Failure taxonomy, eval gap analysis, guardrail review, observability assessment, go/no-go with a written rationale.

Hardening Sprint

Red-teaming, prompt-injection testing, regression eval suite, guardrail implementation, HITL design, observability wiring.

Eval Suite Build

Task-specific rubrics, deterministic graders, golden dataset, LLM-as-judge calibrated against human review, CI-runnable harness.

Agent Operations

Continuous eval runs on every prompt and model change, trajectory review, failure triage, regression maintenance, monthly reliability report, model-upgrade migrations.

Method

What "not human spot-checks" means in practice.

Task-specific rubrics

Scoring criteria written for your workflow, not a generic quality checklist. Agreed with you in week one, revised when inter-annotator agreement says the instruction was ambiguous.

Deterministic graders

Wherever a check can be code instead of opinion, it is. Schema validation, grounding checks, threshold assertions — the same input always scores the same way.

Runnable environments

The harness runs in your CI, on every prompt and model change. An eval you can't re-run isn't an eval — it's a memory of one.

Calibrated judges

Where an LLM-as-judge is used, it's calibrated against human review on a golden set — and we report the agreement number instead of asserting it.

See the work before you talk to us.

A real evaluation report, downloadable directly. No form, no gate. If you want to talk it through afterwards, you'll speak to the engineer who'd do the work — not a salesperson.